Extract from A Dance on Words
By : Søren Ulrik Thomsen
One might at first believe that a poet who had worked sufficiently long
at his trade would have achieved such perfect control of his craft that
he would at any time be able to write a poem. For instance, he could dip
into the fantastic ocean of words in the great Danish dictionary
Ordbog over Det Danske Sprog, select a handful of them and, as far as
form is concerned, construct a text around them. Or conversely, in
complying with a request from a newspaper editor for a poem on a
specific subject, he might take the subject matter as his point of
departure. For a skilled craftsman, it is quite easy in this way to write a
poet that is not bad, but for a poem to be not bad is not the same as its
being good, for in art, craftsmanship is at one and the same time the
most important and the least important of it all.
Let me express myself by means of an analogy: When I set about a
new book, I unpack the surgical instruments of which I have made use
so far and discover that they have become rusty in the meantime, for
they were created in my treatment of a specific material and are not
suitable for dealing with any other, as form and matter only come into
being and gain aesthetical qualification by qualifying each other. If you
are not able formally to measure up to the new material that is now
imposing its presence on you, you are left to make use of such
instruments as are to hand. However, you are thereby limited to writing
the same book as last time and consequently forfeiting the new one,
whose matter both requires and produces new skills, new instruments,
new techniques. As far as I am concerned, the image can be reversed
and it might be said that a new artistic technique makes it possible to
grasp new material; but that mere presence of an artistic talent does not
mean that the artist is endowed with an a priori ability which can at will
be directed towards any arbitrary material. For his skill at controlling is
conversely controlled by the need for material, which for its part is
dissipated the very moment it has found, fulfilled and devoured its
form - hence the enormous sense of void which comes to the poet
along with the reward of intense pleasure on completion of a piece of
work well done. This must not be taken as saying that experience in the
craft is in vain: if we stay with this analogy, we might say that the new
instruments can only be created on the background of the knowledge
gained in shaping the earlier ones - to which the new ones moreover
owe their existence because, as they have become tarnished, the old
instruments have produced a new nescience necessitating and making
possible a new work. Here we stand at the paradox denoting a
crossroads between craftsmanship as normally understood, and artistic
craftsmanship, in which the craftsman"s skill disappears as it is gained,
and vice versa.
|
|